NEARLY 500 objections to a £54 million flood protection scheme have been lodged with East Lothian Council.
Musselburgh Flood Protection Scheme (MFPS) was formally notified in March after councillors rejected calls for it to be paused amid concern it would lose Scottish Government funding.
Now, a report to councillors has revealed that 470 ‘valid’ objections were recorded, but it said that a further 357 responses were ruled invalid, with 55 of them rejected because the objectors did not give their address.
About 140 responses were dismissed because they were duplicates of one already received, while other reasons given for not accepting responses ranged from late submission to not containing an objection and not being made in writing.
READ MORE: First look at how proposed Musselburgh flood defences could look
The MFPS has sparked controversy in the town after costs soared from the original £8.9m in 2016 to a current estimate of £53.9 million.
In January, councillors approved the outline design for the scheme, which they were told needed to be submitted to the Scottish Government by the end of March to qualify for 80 per cent funding in a current cycle of grants.
Opponents of the MFPS, which includes the introduction of walls through the town centre, wanted it paused, claiming that not enough work had been carried out to find "natural solutions" instead of walls. They claimed that less than a tenth of the outline design for the scheme used natural options.
The Musselburgh project aims to protect the town from flooding from the coast and the River Esk, which runs through its centre. Current plans include 4.7km of flood walls with 1.7km made up of “flood embankments and hybrid structures”.
The report on responses breaks down the areas where the objectors live, revealing that 372 live in the EH21 postcode but 66 do not live in East Lothian, while two do not even live in Scotland.
It says: “Musselburgh has a population of circa 21,700 as defined in the 2022 census and the percentage of relevant objectors to this population equates to less than two per cent.”
The council has written to "relevant objectors" offering to meet them to discuss their concerns in an attempt to try and persuade them to withdraw their objections.
If, despite the remaining objections, councillors decide to push ahead with the scheme, their decision will be sent to Scottish Ministers, who will advise them on the next step, which could involve holding a public local inquiry or a local hearing.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here