PLANS to build a ‘grass-roofed’ house next to a listed building have been thrown out, after it was branded a "blot on the landscape" by one councillor.
East Lothian Council planners refused to grant planning permission for the four-bedroom home next to North Berwick’s Heugh Reservoir in July.
However, representatives for applicant Tom Tait challenged the officers' decision and the council’s policy against allowing new houses to be built in the countryside.
In an appeal to the council’s local review body, they argued that the site of the new house was just 180 metres from the town’s boundary and would be "infill" on a corner of an agricultural field which had become unusable.
And they said that the council’s policy against new builds in the countryside was against national guidance.
The new home, at The Heugh, would have had a roof covered with green sedum – a type of plant which grows out in a mat shape.
An artist's impression of the green-roofed home outside North Berwick, with the Heugh Reservoir in the foreground. Image: East Lothian Council planning portal
Sixteen objections to the plans for the new house were lodged, with concerns about the loss of prime agricultural land, impact on wildlife and the views at the site, and claims it would "dwarf the existing pair of houses to its east”.
And North Berwick Community Council objected over the visual impact of the house on the area.
At a meeting of the local review body, councillors expressed concern about the location of the proposed house.
Councillor Cher Cassini said: “It is a stunning area and they have gone to a lot of trouble to try and mitigate the impact but it would be a blot on the landscape, quite frankly.”
And Councillor Andy Forrest agreed, saying that he had no issue with housing being built to enable rural activities as set out in the policy but “a new build [in the countryside] just for a new build, I do not support that”.
The review body unanimously agreed to reject the appeal and uphold the officers' decision.
However, Councillor Jeremy Findlay, ward member, said that he was turning down the appeal with a “heavy heart”.
He said: “It seems strange the rules and regulations stop an individual building a house but do not seem to stop large-scale developers building on agricultural land. That is something we need to look at in the future.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel